Expanding a Plant Without Knowing What's in the Walls Is the Most Expensive Mistake You Can Make

Key takeaways

• A plant expansion that touches existing installations is only as accurate as the information feeding the design.
• Before designing, engineering needs four things in real X-Y-Z coordinates: where the ducts are, how they'll be rerouted, how they integrate with the civil design, and where new equipment ties in.
• A laser scan delivers all four as a millimeter-accurate point cloud — used directly, or modeled to CAD/BIM.
• The alternative — designing on old drawings and verifying during construction — turns into stop-and-redesign or field improvisation, usually several times the scan cost.
• The question isn't whether to scan before expanding; it's when. The answer: before the design advances, not after the contractor finds the problem.

When Goodyear decided to expand its tire plant in Lawton, Oklahoma, the challenge wasn't the construction itself — it was what was in the wall.

The expansion meant extending the plant toward a side where a wall had several ducts running tight against it. These weren't minor installations: they were part of the process, and had to be relocated or reconnected for the new space to work. Before the engineering firm could propose how, they needed to know exactly what was there — positions, diameters, routes, connection points. The available drawings weren't enough. So before designing, they scanned.

What you need to know before you move an installation

A plant expansion involving existing installations has a structural problem: the engineering design can only be as precise as the information that feeds it. If the drawings of existing installations have errors, are outdated, or lack the detail detailed engineering requires, the project starts on uncertain ground — and that uncertainty doesn't disappear. It turns into field surprises.

In this case, the engineering team needed four concrete things before it could propose a solution:

1. Exactly where the ducts were — not approximately, but with the precision an engineering model requires.
2. How they'd be relocated or reconnected — to define new routes, you first have to understand current routes.
3. How to integrate those routes into the civil design — the structural design of the expansion had to account for the space the relocated ducts would occupy.
4. Where new equipment ties in — the tie-in points for new equipment had to be defined in real coordinates.

None of those four was possible without first capturing what existed in that space, accurately.

What would have happened without the scan

The alternative would have been designing the expansion from available drawings and verifying during construction. In active process facilities, improvising with ducts isn't a real option. The cost of resolving a field interference — in construction downtime, change orders, trade coordination — is usually several times the cost of the scan that would have prevented all of it.

We're based in Houston, ISNetworld®-compliant, serving Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and the Gulf Coast. Request a quote or call +1 (832) 746-1497.

Related Articles

• As-Built Drawings: What They Are & Why You Need Them
• Land Surveying vs. 3D Laser Scanning: When to Use Each
• Documenting Complex Process Areas: Multi-Scanner Deployment
• How to Justify a 3D Scanning Project to Management

See It in Action